Azerbaijan journal of Educational studies

ISSN: 0134-3289
E-ISSN: 2617-8060
» » On the Implementation of Student-to-Student Tutoring (STST) in Azerbaijan

On the Implementation of Student-to-Student Tutoring (STST) in Azerbaijan

11 February 2020, Tuesday
229
Volume 689, Issue 4, 2019
Saleh Jafarov ADA University, Baku, Azerbaijan.
E-mail: : ssani@ada.edu.az, ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0646-9913

Received: Sep. 23, 2019;       Accepted: Nov. 10, 2019

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29228/edu.68 Full-Text PDF 
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to identify the benefits of student-to-student academic tutoring and to consider its implementation at a university in Azerbaijan. The international experience of the author gained at the Erasmus University of Rotterdam will contribute to the research. The research will be used as the basis for potential innovation at Azerbaijani universities. The idea is to create a group of teaching assistants (tutors) selected from the top students according to their academic performance and personal characteristics and to organize regular tutorial sessions held by the selected tutors to discuss and consolidate the material previously taught in class by the professors. The process is to be arranged and confirmed by the course lecturers and university administration. It will lead to the deeper involvement of both tutoring and tutored students into the academic environment, help students consolidate their understanding of the material and decrease the burden on lecturers. It will also promote students’ self-study strategies they will feel much more responsible for the level of the knowledge of the material to be presented to the group of peers. The first phase of the research will include investigation of all the stages involved in selecting the students and of the criteria necessary to be selected. Then the grading policy will be analyzed. If there is the chance of the tutoring students being biased towards their fellow students, grading should be conducted only by the professors. The final phase involves surveys conducted among students to measure their needs and the demand for such tutoring sessions. To achieve the goal, the following research question was formulated: What are the benefits of STST and its advantages over traditional teacher-to-student tutoring and why is it important to be practiced in Azerbaijan? It is hoped that the results of this study will can contribute to the debate about STST and to its implementation in Azerbaijan.
 
Keywords: tutors, consolidation, innovation.

To cite this article:
Jafarov S. (2019) On the Implementation of Student-toStudent Tutoring (STST) in Azerbaijan. Azerbaijan Journal of Educational Studies. Vol. 689, Issue IV, pp. 53–60.

References
  1. Allin, L.(2014). Collaboration Between Staff and Students in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: The Potential and the Problems. The ISSOTL Journal, 2(1), 95-102, http://www.jstore.org/stable/10.2979/teachlearninqu.2.1.95 
  2. Bruffee, K. (1993).Collaborative Learning. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
  3. Freire, P. (1998). Pedagogy of Freedom
  4. Jackson, C., & Bruegmann, E. (2009). Teaching Students and Teaching Each Other: The Importance of Peer Learning for Teachers. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 1(4), 85-108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/app.1.4.85
  5. Ladson- Billing, G. (2013). Stakes is High: Educating New Century Students. Journal of Negro Education, 82(2),105- 110 http://www.jstore.org/stable/10.7709/jnegroeducation.82.2.0105
  6. Morgan, J. (2011). Enquiring Minds: a radical curriculum project? Forum: for promoting 3-19 comprehensive education, 53(2), 261-272, http://dx.doi.org/10.2304/forum.2011.53.2.261
  7. Nestojko, J.(2014) Expecting to teach enhances learning and organization of knowledge in free recall of text passages.
  8. Ogava, N. (1997). Let Your Students Teach Their Class. The Internet TESL Journal.
  9. Riese, H. (2012). Peer Relations in Peer Learning. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education. 25(5), 601-624, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2011.605078
  10. Rothenburger, L., Diem, K., Van der Veen, W., & Bellows, T. (2003). Students Teaching Students.
  11. Seyidov, S.(2013). Phenomenology of Creativity: History, Paradoxes, Personality.
  12. Vigotski, L. (1978) Interaction Between Learning and Development. Mind and Society.
  13. Zhang, H., Foskett, N., Wang, D., & Qu, M. (2011). Student Satisfaction with Undergraduate Teaching in China — A Comparison between Researchintensive and Other Universities. Higher Education Policy, 24(1), 1-24.http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/hep.2010.23
Прокомментировать
reload, if the code cannot be seen